Who is this guy? Who does he think Obama is a front for? Brezinski? I don't know why he think Brezinski has so much power, the guys has been a professor and author for years now, I don't think he is stalking the corridors of power in the white house. As for "attacking" Pakistan, that is a ridiculous idea. The last thing anyone would want would be to see the Pakistani government collapse and its nuclear arsenal fall into the hands of some random group, possibly an Islamic terrorist organization, then the US would be really fucked and would have no one to blame but themselves. The north-west of Pakistan is the legitimate ground zero of Al-Qaeda and the global terrorist movement that is gaining strength in Afghanistan. The only way NATO will ever win in Afghanistan is to defeat the forces on the Pakistani side of the border, that is why they are going in to Pakistan, not to bring down the state.
This guy is ridiculous, saying the next big targets are Sudan and Zimbabwe?! Of course these places have oil but so do a ton of other places in the world, why not invade Nigeria (way more oil), why not move into Latin America and get Bolivia's natural gas? China is already so far entrenched in Africa that I don't think the US has any illusions that by attacking Sudan (how?) they can hope to dislodge Chinese interests from the continent.
The picture this guy paints is just too pretty, he tries to tie everything up with a neat little bow. As if global politics is that well coordinated and planned with that much foresight so far into the future, its ridiculous. Of course China is an emerging power but that doesn't mean that all of a sudden, over the course of a couple of years, all of these developments have "suddenly" happened as the puppet masters in the US have changed their target from Al-Qaeda to Beijing. Who are these people apparently running the whole show? Obama as a face of a new imperialism? No body cares about the color of the president's skin when it comes to invading sovereign countries? Imperialism is imperialism and it doesn't take a fucking genius to figure out whether or not something is an act of imperialism. Nobody would be fooled by an "Obama" front if the US started to invade sovereign countries in Africa and break up relatively well established states like Pakistan. These issues are a hell of a lot more compelx and rooted in a much longer history than the past 2 years of domestic American politics. Another classic American who thinks that domestic politics in the US fucking runs the world...
I don't know who he is but he's saying a lot of stuff. He's saying that Obama's supporters are a powerful group of bankers or people with a shitload of money, like George Soros, the Trilateral Commission which Brzezinski is on the executive for. He is saying their goal is world domination for the U.S. and Britain and that China and Russia are the threats to that.
Supposedly Rockefeller and Soros want reductions in standard of living and the impoverishment of the world (or at least US) but he doesn't say why.
The tactic according to this guy is not to attack these countries, it's to subvert the ties to China and Russia. They want to do it covertly and under the guise of humanitarian relief. That's what he's saying about Sudan, that they don't really care about the people dying but they'll use that as a means to get in and subvert the relationship with China.
Same thing with Pakistan, he says the US interest there is that Pakistan has ties to China.
He does make grand claims, but if you accept that the US wants to play China and Russia against each other to hold on to its control over the world - economic, military - it doesn't seem that far fetched. The whole mentality of the US has always been that we should be in charge, and no one else should challenge us.
We should check out the trilateral commission and the principals committee that he mentions.
2 comments:
Who is this guy? Who does he think Obama is a front for? Brezinski? I don't know why he think Brezinski has so much power, the guys has been a professor and author for years now, I don't think he is stalking the corridors of power in the white house. As for "attacking" Pakistan, that is a ridiculous idea. The last thing anyone would want would be to see the Pakistani government collapse and its nuclear arsenal fall into the hands of some random group, possibly an Islamic terrorist organization, then the US would be really fucked and would have no one to blame but themselves. The north-west of Pakistan is the legitimate ground zero of Al-Qaeda and the global terrorist movement that is gaining strength in Afghanistan. The only way NATO will ever win in Afghanistan is to defeat the forces on the Pakistani side of the border, that is why they are going in to Pakistan, not to bring down the state.
This guy is ridiculous, saying the next big targets are Sudan and Zimbabwe?! Of course these places have oil but so do a ton of other places in the world, why not invade Nigeria (way more oil), why not move into Latin America and get Bolivia's natural gas? China is already so far entrenched in Africa that I don't think the US has any illusions that by attacking Sudan (how?) they can hope to dislodge Chinese interests from the continent.
The picture this guy paints is just too pretty, he tries to tie everything up with a neat little bow. As if global politics is that well coordinated and planned with that much foresight so far into the future, its ridiculous. Of course China is an emerging power but that doesn't mean that all of a sudden, over the course of a couple of years, all of these developments have "suddenly" happened as the puppet masters in the US have changed their target from Al-Qaeda to Beijing. Who are these people apparently running the whole show? Obama as a face of a new imperialism? No body cares about the color of the president's skin when it comes to invading sovereign countries? Imperialism is imperialism and it doesn't take a fucking genius to figure out whether or not something is an act of imperialism. Nobody would be fooled by an "Obama" front if the US started to invade sovereign countries in Africa and break up relatively well established states like Pakistan. These issues are a hell of a lot more compelx and rooted in a much longer history than the past 2 years of domestic American politics. Another classic American who thinks that domestic politics in the US fucking runs the world...
I don't know who he is but he's saying a lot of stuff. He's saying that Obama's supporters are a powerful group of bankers or people with a shitload of money, like George Soros, the Trilateral Commission which Brzezinski is on the executive for. He is saying their goal is world domination for the U.S. and Britain and that China and Russia are the threats to that.
Supposedly Rockefeller and Soros want reductions in standard of living and the impoverishment of the world (or at least US) but he doesn't say why.
The tactic according to this guy is not to attack these countries, it's to subvert the ties to China and Russia. They want to do it covertly and under the guise of humanitarian relief. That's what he's saying about Sudan, that they don't really care about the people dying but they'll use that as a means to get in and subvert the relationship with China.
Same thing with Pakistan, he says the US interest there is that Pakistan has ties to China.
He does make grand claims, but if you accept that the US wants to play China and Russia against each other to hold on to its control over the world - economic, military - it doesn't seem that far fetched. The whole mentality of the US has always been that we should be in charge, and no one else should challenge us.
We should check out the trilateral commission and the principals committee that he mentions.
Post a Comment